A second strain of salmonella has been identified by investigators in North Carolina in victims of food poisoning there.
Joe Reardon, director of the N.C. Agriculture Department's Food and Drug Protection Division, told The Associated Press that testing found the salmonella strain oranienburg at a Charlotte-area food supplier. He said that strain has been confirmed in both North Carolina and Texas, where it has been linked to the supplier Grande Produce. Officials have requested that Grande Produce, of Hidalgo, Texas, recall all the implicated products distributed in North Carolina. “It may be contamination of distribution plants. It may be contamination within shipping trucks. All these things are under investigation,” Engel said, adding that a major part of the investigation is focused on Grande Produce. It not yet known whether the most recent discovery is related to the outbreak of the salmonella strain known as Saintpaul which has sickened more than 1,200 people in 42 states. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration lifted its salmonella warning on tomatoes last Thursday. Federal health advisers warned that people most at risk from salmonella – including the elderly and people with weak immune systems – should avoid fresh jalapenos and serranos and any dishes that may contain them, such as fresh salsa.
Joe Reardon, director of the N.C. Agriculture Department's Food and Drug Protection Division, told The Associated Press that testing found the salmonella strain oranienburg at a Charlotte-area food supplier. He said that strain has been confirmed in both North Carolina and Texas, where it has been linked to the supplier Grande Produce.
Officials have requested that Grande Produce, of Hidalgo, Texas, recall all the implicated products distributed in North Carolina.
“It may be contamination of distribution plants. It may be contamination within shipping trucks. All these things are under investigation,” Engel said, adding that a major part of the investigation is focused on Grande Produce.
It not yet known whether the most recent discovery is related to the outbreak of the salmonella strain known as Saintpaul which has sickened more than 1,200 people in 42 states.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration lifted its salmonella warning on tomatoes last Thursday. Federal health advisers warned that people most at risk from salmonella – including the elderly and people with weak immune systems – should avoid fresh jalapenos and serranos and any dishes that may contain them, such as fresh salsa.
Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Salmonella connections? Sent to Lou Dobbs with no reply 07-07/2008 • from Sandi Trend Tonight, July 4, 2008 I listened to your show and Louise Schiavone spoke of the Salmonella outbreaks though out the United States coming from Mexico, although she said they haven’t identified the source. She also said she had spoken to a woman in, I believe it was Minnesota who had Salmonella and “never ate a tomato”. Within the following you will understand my suspicion as to just where the SALMONELLA (and possible prior E-COLI outbreaks) may be coming from, Tlaxcala, Mexico in the form of a bio-pesticide, bio-insecticide or biofungicide etc. (fungus or bacteria). In the case of the company where my son used to work and Tlaxcala, Mexico; this company has a fermentation/manufacturing plant of bio-pesticides, bio-insecticides or biofungicides etc. (fungus or bacteria) that are products tested, sold and “used” on our crops and insects in the United States. When a bio-pesticide, bio-insecticide or biofungicide etc. is going through review by the EPA for registration, or re-registration the EPA either denies the submission or accepts it. In 1999 the company my son worked for had requested a registration from the EPA (which had been previously registered by the EPA) for a “new active ingredient”. Full registration was denied and instead the company only received a \\\"Conditional Time-Limited\\\" Registration [ATTACHED] as the EPA themselves found fault with; Storage stability, Manufacturing process and it was questioned why fish, shrimp and honey bees died. The \\\"Conditional Time-Limited\\\" Registration” issued on June 20, 2000 to the company by the EPA - OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS -PESTICIDES AND POLLUTION PREVENTION DIVISION, FORM 8570?6 states” \\\"After fermentation and prior to further process, each batch must be tested for the following microbial contaminates and have levels below those listed\\\" \\\"E. COLI/COLIFORM BACTERIA\\\" \\\"SALMONELLA\\\" \\\"SHIGELLA\\\" \\\"STAPHYLOCOCCI\\\" \\\"VIBRIO\\\" \\\"YEAST\\\" \\\"MOLD\\\" The above was addressed in my June of 2007 letter to Congressman Waxman with no response. [ATTACHED]. I have also addressed Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey and Congressman Dan Lungren in letters and in person (as have others) concerning the safety to human health and the environment as well as the question of homeland security. Should you wish to view the letters I would be more than happy to send them to you It is extremely concerning why the company, who one would believe would be very careful in sending the EPA an UNCONTAMINATED submission for approval for registration (which it appears was contaminated), would not be questioned with respect to contamination in their products or product candidates that are being tested and sold to be used on our crops and used for insect control. My son also became sick in 1999 while working for this company and despite 4 surgeries (the first in 1999 and the last in 2006), the loss of an intact immune system and over $333,000 worth of medical bills (as of 2005) he has never regained his health as it was before he began employment with the company. \\\"Why\\\" should anyone, with the advanced technology this century has, have to be afraid to be employed, eat agricultural crops, drink water and breath the air in the United States of America? Should you wish to contact me I can be reached at [PHONE # OMITTED]. There is “so much more”. Sincerely, Sandi Trend TO READERS OF FREEDOM PHOENIX: THE CONDITIONAL TIME-LIMITED REGISTRATION [6-20-2000] SPOKE OF IN THE ABOVE WAS ISSUED TO AGRAQUEST INC. SUBMISSION OF QST 713 (BACILLUS SUBTILIS). IF YOU WOULD LIKE A COPY OF THE 4 PAGE DOCUMENT FROM THE EPA AND A COPY OF THE LETTER TO HENRY WAXMAN OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES I WOULD BE GLAD TO SEND THEM TO YOU. PLEASE CONTACT ME AT: strend@surewest.net____http//video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8772395089110184693 Labor Video Project - May 13, 2008 Description: focuses on the case of Agraquest biotech worker David Bell. Bell who worked at the Davis, CA biotech laboratory owned by ormer Monsanto scientist Pam Marrone was infected with fungus and Bacteria while working. He and his family have faced a terrifying battle for healthcare and justice from injuries on the job. Despite the fact that his mother found material in his body that was patented by scientists at the laboratory he has been Prevented from getting full healthcare to save his life. The corruption and breakdown of the workers compensation system is connected to the deregulation of workers compensation and the elimination of all medical doctors at Ca-OSHA Joining the show: Steve Zeltzer - Host and interviewer from Labor On The Job Project and an Injured Workers Advocate for many years Dr. Larry Rose - The "last" Cal/OSHA Public Health Medical Officer in the state of California, was with Cal/OSHA for 28 years Dan Berman - Author of "DEATH ON THE JOB" Sandi Trend - Mother of David Bell, injured and a former "Assistant Researcher" of the biotech company, Agraquest Inc., Davis, California QUOTEDr. Larry Rose Well, it sounds' it sounds like it's a hype to me in terms of calling it organic. First off, if you're using pathogenic organisms that's not exactly organic.... that's a risk not only the environment, the workers... but also possibly the food Consumers as well. QUOTEDr. Larry Rose I'd like to inject here that the way they classify biosafety in labs is they classify it 1 through 4. Say the most hazardous, say like anthrax would be a 4 so you have to have like space suits and total control. Now if these were pathogens he was working with it sounds that should rate very high in biosafety requirements.QUOTEDr. Larry Rose - Yea... If they're using potentially pathogenic microorganisms to spread on... you know, vast areas of the environment in relation to say, specific what they call pests the first thing you would have to determine if OSHA went in there... and what I can.... I'll get the record but from what I can tell first thing they would've had to have was either a microbiologist or a Doctor, a public health Doctor to look at how pathogenic are these organisms. Are they as bad as, say Anthrax? Could they be? And then you have to determine do they have the proper level of bio safety? And then you don't go and just look at the face velocity of a vertical lamenter flow hood... that's nonsense! What you do is then you go back and you say, "you've got the wrong level". you cite them and you require them to get the right level of bio safety and the other things... not spread the agent around in the neighborhood and that would be the Approach.... and if they don't have a Doctor at Cal/OSHA to do that or.... you know.... then ... they're going in blind. QUOTEDr. Larry Rose - When you're called in and a worker has possibly picked up a very serious infectious disease from the work Process, you don't just go in and measure a face velocity and give a tag. You've gotta do some... you know real investigation. Go over all the medical records and you've got to get the Organism and submit it to the proper lab to determine it's patogenicity. In other words, there's a series of steps you would take because you're not only trying to protect all the workers there now and future workers, but you also have to protect the community when you're talking about an infectious disease, this is a serious public health matter. So looking at what OSHA did and I'm just astounded that they had that kind of very weak response, inappropriate response according to the law. The law states that you have to have to go through this kind of process and you certainly can't fire a worker whose complaining. Also, OSHA should have responded within 72 hours, that's required by law in this kind of.. you know, complaint. I don't know what they Were doing, but they obviously handled the thing illegally.
Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader
Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.
Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.
Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.
Find an InjuryBoard Blog in your area:
Alabama
Birmingham
Gadsden
Huntsville
Mobile
Montgomery
Alaska
Anchorage
Fairbanks
Arizona
Chandler
Phoenix
Scottsdale
Tucson
Arkansas
Bentonville
El Dorado
Jonesboro
Little Rock
Mountain Home
California
Bakersfield
Chico
Fresno
Glendale
Huntington Beach
Lancaster
Long Beach
Los Angeles
Modesto
Novato
Oakland
Orange County
Redding
Sacramento
San Diego
San Diego County
San Francisco
San Jose
San Luis Obispo
Santa Clarita
Stockton
Ventura
Colorado
Colorado Springs
Denver
Fort Collins
Grand Junction
Connecticut
Hartford
New Haven
Waterbury
District of Columbia
Metro D.C.
Washington
Florida
Central Florida
Fort Lauderdale
Ft. Myers
Gainesville, Ocala & Daytona Beach
Jacksonville
Melbourne
Miami
Orlando
Pensacola
Sarasota
Tallahassee
Tampa Bay
West Palm Beach
Georgia
Atlanta
Hawaii
Honolulu
Idaho
Boise
Illinois
Chicago
Chicago-Land
Cook County
Rockford & Moline
Springfield
Indiana
Bloomington
Indianapolis
Iowa
Council Bluffs
Davenport
Des Moines
Fort Dodge
Waterloo
Kansas
Topeka
Wichita
Kentucky
Bowling Green
Louisville
Paducah
Louisiana
Baton Rouge
Lafayette
New Orleans
Maine
Bangor & Augusta
Maryland
Baltimore
Massachusetts
Boston
Cape Cod
Stoughton / Canton
Michigan
Detroit
Grand Rapids
Lansing
Traverse City
Minnesota
Minneapolis
St. Cloud
Mississippi
Biloxi & Gulfport
Tupelo
Missouri
Jefferson City
Kansas City
St. Louis
Montana
Missoula
Nebraska
Lincoln
Omaha
Nevada
Las Vegas
Reno
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Bergen County
Cherry Hill
Jersey City
Newark
Trenton
New York
Buffalo
Long Island
New York City
Northern New York
Syracuse
North Carolina
Charlotte
Fayetteville
Greensboro
Greenville, OBX & Rocky Mount
Raleigh
Wilmington
Ohio
Akron
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Dayton
Findlay
Sandusky
Toledo
Oklahoma
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
Oregon
Portland
Pennsylvania
Philadelphia
Rhode Island
Providence
South Carolina
Charleston
Columbia
Florence / Myrtle Beach
Greenville
Spartanburg
Tennessee
Chattanooga
Nashville
Texas
Austin
Beaumont
Brownsville
Corpus Christi
Dallas
Galveston Bay
Houston
Laredo
McAllen
North Dallas
San Antonio
Tyler
Victoria
Waco
Utah
Salt Lake City
Vermont
Virginia
Charlottesville
Fairfax, Leesburg & Loudoun
Norfolk, Portsmouth & Hampton
Northern Virginia
Richmond
Roanoke
Virginia Beach, Chesapeake & Suffolk
Everett
King County
Olympia
Seattle
Tacoma
Vancouver
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Milwaukee
Wyoming
Cheyenne